The Common Core and Standardized Testing in K-12 Education

Picture of Dr. Ionel Coltea

Dr. Ionel Coltea

The Common Core and Standardized Testing in K-12 Education

The debate over the Common Core and standardized testing in k-12 education has a long history. But what are the benefits and drawbacks of implementing a standardized test? The answer is a complex one, and the debate is likely to continue until the Common Core is deemed a success. Many educators and experts oppose the new standards, while others are adamantly in favor of the Common Core.

The Common Core curriculum and new assessments were introduced in 2012, with three million public school teachers required to retool their teaching practices and use new materials aligned with the Common Core standards. At the same time, large numbers of students failed to pass the new assessments. Meanwhile, many parents questioned how to explain the unfamiliar homework assignments. What happened to the good stuff? Whether it is homework, reading comprehension, or writing skills, Common Core is clearly pushing educators to a new low.

Many educators, including myself, are concerned that a uniform approach to learning is not the best way to educate students. Educators know that every student learns differently, and that education should reflect individual needs. This is why Ralph Waldo Emerson said, “Foolish consistency is the worst form of wisdom.” The Common Core has run through all of that. Let’s take a look at the benefits and drawbacks of the Common Core.

The development of the Common Core has been controversial. The Common Core was a massive undertaking that took 18 months to complete. The groups behind it gathered input from experts and the public. After that, it was finalized in June 2010. Critics and supporters of the program say that it will increase student engagement and improve academic skills. Despite the controversy, however, the new standards are an important step in improving education.

Although some critics have argued that the new standards are harmful to student achievement, a recent study suggests that the Common Core may not have such a dramatic effect. The authors of the study say that the changes have led to modest gains for students but fall short of the far-reaching goals of Common Core supporters. This may be the reason why many educators continue to oppose the program. The results of the federal NAEP tests show that states implementing the Common Core have not increased student achievement.

In addition to these concerns, many states are considering implementing their own standards in lieu of the Common Core assessments. In Indiana, state officials have begun to write their own tests to replace the Common Core tests. Oklahoma, meanwhile, has passed legislation banning Common Core tests altogether. And even if the tests themselves do not affect student achievement, the debate isn’t over. In New York, despite the controversy surrounding the Common Core, scores continue to show steady progress.

In fact, there has been a decline in the number of participating states. While the decrease in the participation rate isn’t a glaring indicator of failure, it does show a pattern that suggests that the program is failing. As a result, some schools have decided to drop out of the tests. But the results are merely used to develop future assessments. The results of these tests will help the company develop future assessments.

See our certificates and courses here.

© Photo by

Learn more about our certificates and courses here.

Share this post